Not everyone would agree, but Dr. John Mark Reynolds demonstrates that Dickens makes a pretty convincing argument for basic feminism — “the equal and full humanity of women and men before Providence” — in Dombey and Son.
I totally disagree with Dr. Reynold’s assumptions and would argue a strong case to the contrary. For Dickens was that most inveterate of misogynists, since not merely a card-carrying, patriarchal product of his own times, but one who rather dangerously exhibited strong proclivities towards a Lolita Complex and sadism, when it came to his dealings with women.
I smile as I write this; recalling the insight propounded by Dickens himself in “Our Mutual Friend,” concerning the feminine instinct for uneeringly discerning the unpalatable underbelly of a frog, sans any need whatsoever to overturn that clammy specimen. For according to the scornful declaration made by Mrs. Sophronia Lammle – utterances later mused upon with a similarly laconic weariness: “Men are very wise in their way…but they have wisdom to learn….”
I’m with you. Thank heavens for his explanation as the series had me thinking that Amy and Arthur shared the…
I have way the miniseries countless times and the explanation I came away with from the miniseries had me thinking…
I love watching Charles Dickens stories. Im always ready to see any classic I can whenever there is one. When…
[…] retelling of the story with a few added antics from Johnny Depp, which makes me curious about all the…
Yes, it’s such a shame, isn’t it? I think a reread to remind ourselves of all the good stuff is…
Leave a Reply